STATUS/ACCOMPLISHMENTS The systems team released the draft SDO Mission Requirements Document (MRD) for general review by Instrument and spacecraft subsystem teams. The MRD captures the SDO level 2 requirements and provides traceability back to the Level 1 Science Requirements document. The initial MRD release & review is in preparation for the SDO Systems Requirements Retreat (SRR) next month, which is intended to be a detailed review and validation of the SDO level 2 requirements before they are brought under configuration control. The systems team also released a draft document tree for the SDO team to review. This document tree details the work products that will need to be generated in the coming months and also acts as a road map for our future work. We continue to work and focus on two different spacecraft/instrument module mechanical configurations and accommodation issues in preparation for the System Concept Review. We developed a package highlighting the SDO/Launch Vehicle accommodation challenges which was briefed to the GSFC program today. Next week, we will complete the GSFC review & finalize the presentation so that we can brief NASA Code S on 1/24/03. We continue to work the grassroots cost estimates. This week we had meetings with the mechanical team to go over structure/deployables/MSGE development, the common Subsystem Data Node team to discuss schedule & status, and we had discussions relating to the I&T flow & EGSE costs. Our plan is to have all the subsystem schedules created and linked to the spacecraft integration flow by 2/10/03. From the last 2 weeks of meetings, we learned more about budget/schedule risks, so I our risk management coordinator has started to meet with all the leads in order to update the project risk list. The SDO business team attended the very informative IFMP meeting & completed tools for the upcoming budget process. In the area of Instruments, we prepared and released an Instrument Interface Requirements Checklist which captures in some significant detail candidate requirement items for the SDO spacecraft to instruments interface requirements documentation. In addition, we developed an agenda for the upcoming Instrument Systems Requirements Review which will be held at the Instrumenters facility following our internal SDO Systems Requirements Retreat. Our Contracting Officer created a time-line for the preparation and generation of the required Instrument Phase B/C/D/E contract documentation and we generated a couple of content outlines for the Instrument Performance Specifications. The HMI team participated in several telecons and other discussions this week to exchange information in preparation for our internal SRR. The team is working to provide updates or new information regarding pointing and alignment needs, mass properties, a top level FEM, radiator loads, a top level thermal math model, limb tracking needs and electrical interface data. We introduced the HMI team to Steve Merrihew for ICD development, Tom Manson for System Reliability, and Steve Schumacher for C&DH information. The HMI Instrument System Requirements Review is scheduled for March 13, 2003 at Lockheed Martin Palo Alto. The GFSC Instrument team & Flight Assurance Mgr. will be traveling to Boulder CO for an interchange meeting & site visit with the EVE LASP team. We completed our GSFC housing requirements through FY07 which includes all personnel supporting SDO on-site (civil servant or contractor) and submitted the information to our LWS program office. We are currently working SDO's housing requirements in Bldg. 29/Room 360 and with the launch of ICESat, SDO should be able to occupy the GLAS cubicles within the next 90 days. The ground system team revised antenna link margin design parameters, updated the Detailed Mission Requirements with level-2 requirements, and started a draft of the Operations Concept. We received and started reviewing the preliminary "Rain Study" analysis for the White Sands ground station. The Flight Assurance team began development of the SDO Software QA Plan and updated the SDO System Safety Program Plan for review. Thanks & sorry for being late with this report, Ken "The purpose of the Formulation subprocess is to refine mission concepts in order to define an affordable program and plan to meet mission objectives or technology goals specified in the NASA and SSE Strategic Plans. The Formulation subprocess includes developing advanced concepts, conducting trade studies, defining technology development goals, exploring implementation options, establishing internal management control functions, performing cost and performance analyses on concepts deemed to have a high degree of technical and operational feasibility, and identifying reserves associated with program risk management and other estimated project reserves." Space Science Enterprise Management Handbook