STATUS/ACCOMPLISHMENTS The SDO GN&C team provided a Reaction Wheel make/buy trade assessment. The assessment included a thorough analysis of requirements and a comparison of candidate hardware performance, cost, and schedule. The make/buy decision will be made in the near future, pending receipt of additional vendor information. The Subsystem Data Node (SDN) team completed layout of the SDN prototype board. The prototype boards are now being fabricated and the parts kitting is in process with assembly beginning in a couple of weeks. For the Instruments, we reviewed the revised MIT Lincoln Labs SOW for the EVE CCD development work and provided comments to EVE. We intend to provide funds for an early start of this work and we are in the process of generating a CCR to mod the EVE SOW accordingly. We held an accommodations coordination meeting with SHARPP to consider and discuss placement requirements for SHARPP's KCOR, CCD electronics box, relocation of KCOR and AIA (Atmospheric Imaging Assembly) mounting feet, and a repackaging of the SHARPP main electronics box to satisfy SDO volume and connector/harnessing restrictions and proximity requirements for SHARPP's mechanism drivers. We also conducted a weekly telecon with the instrumenters to go over high-speed bus design decisions and associated physical and functional interface requirements. The ground system received 8 responses from industry regarding the RFI for decoders and receivers. One company in particular has a viterbi decoder all on a single board. If our analysis is proves out then the ground system will purchase this item rather than build it. An RFI was also issued to seek industry input on the state of technology for Network Storage Devices. We continue working towards determining if command encryption is necessary for SDO. The Ground System team has developed a draft fault tree analysis (for subsystem review) that identifies high, medium, and low risk areas. The team is also making good progress refining schedules and documenting detailed mission & interface requirements. In the area of CM & Project Support, the team provided document/drawing numbers, updated the document tree, started testing portions of our internal intranet database, distributed 2 CCRs for review/comments in preparation for next week's CCB meeting, released updated mass budget, and reviewed/generated comments on 400-PG-1410.1.1A (Directives Management for Flight Programs and Projects), 400-PG-1410.1.2B (Configuration Control), and GPG 7120.1B (Program and Project Management). We are also working with other Bldg. 29 occupants to discuss their schedules for vacating cubicles in Bldg. 29/Room 360 so that SDO may occupy the space when available. Thanks, Ken [ Attachment (text/x-html): 2871 bytes Character set: us-ascii ]